Tokyo IPO Monthly Report -November 2008-
The total number of IPOs in 2008 will probably be fewer than 50 (44
companies have received a listing approval this year as of November 7), far
below the 121 IPOs in 2007. All three of Japanfs small-company stock
markets have seen the number of IPOs drop to the lowest level since 2000.
Looking back, the last time Japan had fewer than 100 IPOs in a year was in
1992, when the IPO market was effectively halted.
Since many Japanese companies end their fiscal years in March, we
normally see more than 10 IPOs each month in the fall because of the time
required by the IPO process. But there were only four IPOs in October this
year. Next year, Japan will start using electronic stock certificates. I have
heard that many companies planning on IPOs late this year are pushing back
their offering dates to next year. Apparently, they want to cut IPO expenses
by using electronic stock certificates. But securities companies and
accountants do not necessarily agree. Many people believe that the uncertain
outlook for earnings and deteriorating market conditions are behind the
postponement of IPOs.
Thus far in 2008, IPO opening prices are an average of 21.8% higher than
offering prices. Since 2000, this figure was lower only in 2000 when the
average increase was 18.5%. But the story is different in terms of the
percentage of opening prices that exceeded the offering prices. In 2000, 64%
of IPOs started trading above the offering price. In 2008, fewer than half of
IPOs had an opening price above the offering price. This low percentage is
caused by the much greater differences in opening prices of the 2008
offerings. In the past, investors were convinced they could make a big profit
every time by purchasing initial and secondary offerings. But no one
believes this anymore.
On the secondary market, IPO stocks have performed very poorly. Based on
October 30 closing prices, 118 IPO stocks of 2007 are an average of 54.9%
below their offering prices. For 36 stocks with a 2008 IPO, the average
decline is 24.3%. By market, the Osaka Hercules has the largest stock price
drops for both the 2007 and 2008 IPOs.
2007 IPO Performance Summary
|
Issues |
Open vs.
offering |
10/30vs.
offering |
10/30vs.
opening |
TSE Mothers |
23 |
88.6% |
-12.8% |
-52.0% |
JASDAQ |
45 |
43.4% |
-64.5% |
-72.3% |
OSE Hercules |
24 |
63.8% |
-67.5% |
-79.8% |
TSE 1st/2nd |
13 |
12.2% |
-58.6% |
-59.3% |
All markets |
118 |
50.4% |
-54.9% |
-67.7% |
2008 IPO Performance Summary
|
Issues |
Open vs.
offering |
10/30vs.
offering |
10/30vs.
opening |
TSE Mothers |
11 |
61.0% |
5.5% |
-30.1% |
JASDAQ |
11 |
-1.8% |
-27.1% |
-24.6% |
OSE Hercules |
7 |
30.4% |
-44.0% |
-56.0% |
TSE 2nd |
4 |
-6.7% |
-43.4% |
-39.1% |
All markets |
36 |
21.8% |
-24.3% |
-36.1% |
Open vs. offering = Opening price/Offering price
10/30 vs. offering = 10/30 close/Offering price
10/30 vs. opening = 10/30 close/Opening price
Letfs take a closer look at why prices of IPO stocks have continued to drop.
Offering prices are determined by using comparisons with peer companies.
A suitable price is calculated by using the PER and other stock price metrics
of these other companies. Finally, the so-called IPO discount is applied to
this price to come up with the offering price. That means offering prices
carry much lower valuations than the stocks of peer companies.
But this approach has a problem: the valuation assumes that the stock market
will remain flat between the price determination date and IPO date. Of
course, stock prices have been falling consistently for more than one year.
After an offering price has been set, prices of peer company stocks moved
even lower. As a result, in many instances, this widely accepted method for
calculating offering prices no longer yielded prices that were appropriate on
the initial offering date. Investors must also remember that the central
mission of initial and secondary offerings is to increase the number of
shareholders of a company. Accomplishing this goal requires selling most of
the shares to individuals.
Once an IPO stock falls below its offering price, individual investors are
almost always the first to sell their holdings to cut losses. After that,
regardless of a companyfs future prospects and earnings, the stock price will
continue to fall if institutions shun a stock from the standpoints of market
capitalization and liquidity. This explains why most IPO stocks are staying
below their offering prices.
I realize that my discussion thus far has covered only bad news. So I would
like to end with an encouraging topic. All of you are certainly well aware
that stock prices in Japan have dropped to a level seen only once every few
decades. I urge you to pay attention to the fact that 2007 and 2008 IPO
stocks have valuations lower than even the depressed market average. Many
of these stocks have single-digit PERs but are not yet attracting the interest
of institutional investors. Much more time may be required until companies
finally see their growth potential accurately reflected in their stock prices.
But an upturn in prices will require nothing more than a return to normal
market conditions. This would very likely raise the prices of many IPO
stocks as they climb back to average market valuations. Instability in the
economy and financial markets will probably continue for some time. Even
so, investors should regard todayfs valuations as an excellent opportunity to
pick up recent IPO stocks at bargain prices.

Nishibori Takashi
Tokyo IPO.com Chief Editor
Email to :editor@tokyoipo.com
|